<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Defining Speculative Fiction	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://diymfa.com/writing/defining-speculative-fiction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://diymfa.com/writing/defining-speculative-fiction/</link>
	<description>Tools &#38; Techniques for the Serious Writer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2018 23:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: JD Lasica		</title>
		<link>https://diymfa.com/writing/defining-speculative-fiction/#comment-4249</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JD Lasica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2018 23:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://diymfa.com/?p=30491#comment-4249</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Excellent distillation, Melanie. Speculative fiction appears to be more wide-ranging than I imagined.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent distillation, Melanie. Speculative fiction appears to be more wide-ranging than I imagined.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Doug Brower		</title>
		<link>https://diymfa.com/writing/defining-speculative-fiction/#comment-3845</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug Brower]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2017 17:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://diymfa.com/?p=30491#comment-3845</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi! Interesting post! I read somewhere a definition of speculative fiction as the story that spins out of one big what-if: What if the Axis powers won WWII (The Man In the High Castle)? What if humans could no longer reproduce (Children of Men)? And so on. Science fiction and fantasy, on the other hand, create entire worlds from many imaginative leaps crossing thresholds of known science and possibility.

The classification works pretty well. Margaret Atwood famously took issue with describing The Handmaid&#039;s Tale as science fiction, insisting that it be considered speculative because everything in it could happen. (Let&#039;s not ponder, as Atwood has done herself recently, whether Offred&#039;s world is in fact dawning before our eyes. Will The Handmaid&#039;s Tale one day be read as the prehistory of America&#039;s 21st century? There I go, a-pondering.). Station Eleven likewise fits the speculative model, with its devastating global plague, whereas Larry Niven&#039;s Ringworld - despite the big what-if smack in the title - doesn&#039;t. Niven was always proud of the &quot;science&quot; at the heart of his big ideas.

No scheme of cubbyholes is ever perfect. The novel I&#039;m writing features talking animals (though it&#039;s not a children&#039;s story). That&#039;s the one big what-if, everything else is just-the-facts-ma&#039;am, but the work itself is fantasy, obviously.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi! Interesting post! I read somewhere a definition of speculative fiction as the story that spins out of one big what-if: What if the Axis powers won WWII (The Man In the High Castle)? What if humans could no longer reproduce (Children of Men)? And so on. Science fiction and fantasy, on the other hand, create entire worlds from many imaginative leaps crossing thresholds of known science and possibility.</p>
<p>The classification works pretty well. Margaret Atwood famously took issue with describing The Handmaid&#8217;s Tale as science fiction, insisting that it be considered speculative because everything in it could happen. (Let&#8217;s not ponder, as Atwood has done herself recently, whether Offred&#8217;s world is in fact dawning before our eyes. Will The Handmaid&#8217;s Tale one day be read as the prehistory of America&#8217;s 21st century? There I go, a-pondering.). Station Eleven likewise fits the speculative model, with its devastating global plague, whereas Larry Niven&#8217;s Ringworld &#8211; despite the big what-if smack in the title &#8211; doesn&#8217;t. Niven was always proud of the &#8220;science&#8221; at the heart of his big ideas.</p>
<p>No scheme of cubbyholes is ever perfect. The novel I&#8217;m writing features talking animals (though it&#8217;s not a children&#8217;s story). That&#8217;s the one big what-if, everything else is just-the-facts-ma&#8217;am, but the work itself is fantasy, obviously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
