<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: #5OnFri: Five Basics That Will Sharpen Your Writing	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://diymfa.com/writing/five-basics-that-will-sharpen-your-writing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://diymfa.com/writing/five-basics-that-will-sharpen-your-writing/</link>
	<description>Tools &#38; Techniques for the Serious Writer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2015 16:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: DIYMFA		</title>
		<link>https://diymfa.com/writing/five-basics-that-will-sharpen-your-writing/#comment-1660</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DIYMFA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2015 16:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://diymfa.com/?p=14292#comment-1660</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great point on the passive, but I think I get what Kat is getting at and it&#039;s a subtle distinction. The example she gives, while not strictly passive voice in the grammarian sense, is what many authors colloquially call &quot;passive writing&quot; because the verb has lost its punch. When you shift from a present tense or straight-up past tense (sometimes called the &quot;perfect past&quot;) to a gerund, subjunctive, or imperfect past tense the verb loses that &quot;verb-y-ness&quot; that it otherwise has and gives the verb that active feel. Gerunds, subjunctives, etc. end up feeling less &quot;active&quot; even though in the grammarian sense, thy are still considered the active voice.


You&#039;re right that strictly speaking the example above is not the passive voice, but many times writers refer to this type of writing as passive in a sort of writer&#039;s jargon.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great point on the passive, but I think I get what Kat is getting at and it&#8217;s a subtle distinction. The example she gives, while not strictly passive voice in the grammarian sense, is what many authors colloquially call &#8220;passive writing&#8221; because the verb has lost its punch. When you shift from a present tense or straight-up past tense (sometimes called the &#8220;perfect past&#8221;) to a gerund, subjunctive, or imperfect past tense the verb loses that &#8220;verb-y-ness&#8221; that it otherwise has and gives the verb that active feel. Gerunds, subjunctives, etc. end up feeling less &#8220;active&#8221; even though in the grammarian sense, thy are still considered the active voice.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right that strictly speaking the example above is not the passive voice, but many times writers refer to this type of writing as passive in a sort of writer&#8217;s jargon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
