This is a DIY MFA Manifesto for Why Writers Must Be Readers First
One year ago, I heard Richard Nash (Publisher of Red Lemonade) give a fascinating talk about how writers have to be readers. His argument was that reading and writing are the opposite sides of the same interaction. I remember thinking: OMG did he read my mind? This is exactly the sort of stuff I’ve been obsessing over ever since I started DIY MFA. In fact, after hearing Nash speak, I am completely convinced that reading can, in fact, change the world.
Some time ago, I posed the following statements for discussion among my writer friends.
Writing is the ultimate form of manipulation.
Reading is the supreme act of defiance.
Some people got the writing part of the equation right away. When we write, we can control the words and how we express them to guide the reader in whatever direction we choose. Writing–if you really think about it–is no more than a few inky scribbles on a page. Lines and dots. But if we’re strategic in how we use those lines and dots, we can actually put ideas into our reader’s head. We can direct and manipulate what our reader imagines and how our reader responds. Richard Nash had a great analogy for this concept in his talk: “Our words are hours that we can take up inside someone’s head.”
I don’t know about you, but I think that’s a powerful thing (and not a privilege to be taken lightly).
But what about the reading part? How can reading be an act of defiance? Some people might read to get the information or to figure what the author’s trying to say, and that’s fine. But the moment you realize that everything the writer’s doing with his words is essentially an act of manipulation–a way of taking up real estate inside your brain–then you can start reading like a revolutionary. All it takes is awareness, knowing that the writer’s doing some slight of hand tricks and is trying to direct your mind this way or that. Once you’re aware of this manipulation, you can step back and decide if you actually want to be directed.
And as soon as you do that, you’ve become a rebel. You’re fighting the machine. You’re Reading.
And how, exactly, can Reading change the world? That’s easy. One of the biggest problems I see with the world is that everyone out there is trying to be a writer. Everyone’s got an agenda; they’re trying to use their words and take up mental real estate and get people to listen to what they have to say. The problem is, very few people out there put effort into Reading-with-a-capital-R.
I totally get why that happens, though. Reading like that can be exhausting, sort of like watching a magic show and constantly trying to figure out how the magician pulled off the last trick. Our world is so saturated with information that it would be impossible to read like a revolutionary all the time. We’d all lose our minds. The trouble is, a lot of people have stopped Reading all together. They just accept the information they see at face value and move on to the next thing. I call this voluntary illiteracy. Sure, they can read the lines and dots on the page, but are they really READING the meaning behind those scribbles?
In the end, Nash’s speech came down to one important point: “Writing and reading are behaviors. Most people do both.” I agree completely and would add only one thing: To change the world, we need to do both and do them responsibly.
I thank you all for the privilege of letting me take up a small slice of your mental real estate. Now go out there and do something amazing with your words.
Now I turn this question to all of you:
Do you see yourself first as a writer or a reader? Do you think it’s possible to be one without also being the other?